DHIL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. has a net margin of 23.6% compared to Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net margin of 31.35%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.92% beat Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 52.59%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $42.75 which suggests that it could grow by 6.13%. Given that Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.361% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. has a beta of 1.774, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.442%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. offers a yield of 7.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays 33.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. pays out 77.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39.3M, which are smaller than Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $350.7M. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $9.3M is lower than Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc.'s net income of $109.9M. Notably, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.60x while Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. is 2.96x versus 2.10x for Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

California First Leasing Corp. has a net margin of 23.6% compared to Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.92% beat California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand California First Leasing Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.361% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.159, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.132%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. California First Leasing Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays 33.51% of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39.3M, which are larger than California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $9.3M is higher than California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.60x while California First Leasing Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. is 2.96x versus 25.73x for California First Leasing Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of 23.6% compared to Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net margin of 19.46%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.92% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 26.48%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $72.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.67%. Given that Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.361% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.458%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays 33.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 83.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39.3M, which are smaller than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $157.8M. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $9.3M is lower than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.60x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 22.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. is 2.96x versus 6.03x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of 23.6% compared to Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net margin of 7.34%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.92% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.21%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.27 which suggests that it could grow by 16.99%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.361% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.514, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.617%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 14.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays 33.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s is not.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $39.3M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $76.4M. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $9.3M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $5.6M. Notably, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.60x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 31.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. is 2.96x versus 3.24x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.